海归网首页   海归宣言   导航   博客   广告位价格  
海归论坛首页 会员列表 
收 藏 夹 
论坛帮助 
登录 | 登录并检查站内短信 | 个人设置 论坛首页 |  排行榜  |  在线私聊 |  专题 | 版规 | 搜索  | RSS  | 注册 | 活动日历
主题: [转帖]技术前瞻:标普酝酿攻势
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙
  阅读上一个主题 :: 阅读下一个主题
作者 [转帖]技术前瞻:标普酝酿攻势   
所跟贴 今天攻势漂亮 -- gigilang - (9 Byte) 2008-8-29 周五, 05:00 (403 reads)
theoretical
[博客]
[个人文集]




头衔: 海归上校

头衔: 海归上校
声望: 院士
性别: 性别:男
加入时间: 2006/10/13
文章: 5521

海归分: 69567





文章标题: I am shorting. If index up tomorrow, short more. (401 reads)      时间: 2008-8-29 周五, 08:50
  

作者:theoretical海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com

BS GDP data, low volumn, before long weekend, perfect time to short. check this out:

"Predictably, markets cheered the seemingly strong GDP report.

Nominal GDP growth was upwardly revised from 3.0% to 4.6%. At the same time, as the domestic product deflator was upwardly revised from 1.1% to 1.3% and the domestic purchases deflator was upwardly revised from 4.3% to 4.4%, this means that unadjusted growth was upwardly revised from 1.9% to 3.3%, and adjusted growth from -1.3% to 0.2%.

Yet what seemed to be ignored was that the report also said that corporate profits fell again-and this despite the fact that the BEA definition of profits is unaffected by write-downs. Overall corporate profits fell in nominal terms by an annual rate of 9.2% compared to the previous quarter and by 7% compared to Q2 2007. If you adjust for inflation, then we're talking about double digit declines in corporate profits.

And moreover, this number would have been even more dismal if it hadn't been for the rising profits from the foreign subsidiaries of American companies compared to the profits of the subsidiaries of foreign companies in America. The profits of domestic non-financial companies fell in nominal terms as much as 21.8% at an annual rate compared to the previous quarter and by 17,4% compared to Q2 2007. Adjusted for inflation, these declines are even larger.

The point about that is first of all is that it will likely cause companies to reduce their investments in the future. And the second point about that is that if there really was such a strong boom as the headline GDP figure claims and if profits fell so dramatically, then who is reaping the benefits of this alleged boom? Workers? No. While they at least enjoyed rising nominal income (+3.1%), real compensation of workers fell by 1.2%. Government? No. The budget deficit soared during the second quarter and increased even excluding the effect of the so-called tax rebates.

So, if all sectors -corporations, workers, government- of the American economy suffers from falling real income, then how could real GDP boom by more than 3%? There's something seriously wrong with that picture.

However, this discrepancy is not a mystery. In my post on the previous GDP report, I explained this mystery. First, there is the terms of trade effect, which accounts for almost the entire alleged GDP growth. Secondly, there is the statistical discrepancy effect. National income rose only 2.1% in nominal terms, compared to 4.6% for nominal GDP, despite the fact that factor income from abroad fell this quarter compared to the previous one. This was the fifth quarter in a row that national income increased less (decreased more) than nominal GNP. With inflation during the quarter running at 4.3%, real national income fell by more than 2%.

Some would perhaps argue that I am biased by assuming that the national income measure is more reliable than GDP. After all, this discrepancy could reflect an underestimation of national income as well as an overestimation of GDP. This is true, but given the other indicators available, both in other government reports, in private sector reports and reports of increasing economic discontent, it seems clear that the national income number better reflect economic reality."

作者:theoretical海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com









相关主题
[讨论]技术前瞻:美股或将现中期底,反弹之前可能出现清除弱手的震仓行情 海归主坛 2008-6-27 周五, 04:32
[分享]技术前瞻:美股或大幅回调 海外移民 2008-5-08 周四, 10:03
“以貌取人”技术讲座:案例分析:返美签证险被拒,只因我穿了件不对路的衣服(转帖) 海归茶馆 2009-12-26 周六, 06:26
[问题]技术咨询:如何对当地所有广播电台电视台(频道)自动同时实行24小时... 海归主坛 2013-6-20 周四, 13:12
高端技术职位:高级封装专家 IT 2012-6-27 周三, 11:02
【三人行必无朕师】浅析团购2.0商业模型表象下的深层技术架构:一人相亲团,... 海归商务 2011-9-15 周四, 13:26
[ZT]网友技术分析:为什么美国男人不包二奶? 海归酒吧 2011-8-20 周六, 23:03
[转帖]技术领先就能占领市场(人民日报创新故事) 创业园区 2011-5-20 周五, 11:28

返回顶端
阅读会员资料 theoretical离线  发送站内短信
显示文章:     
回复主题   printer-friendly view    海归论坛首页 -> 海归商务           焦点讨论 | 精华区 | 嘉宾沙龙 | 白领丽人沙龙 所有的时间均为 北京时间


 
论坛转跳:   
不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, 
   热门标签 更多...
   论坛精华荟萃 更多...
   博客热门文章 更多...


海归网二次开发,based on phpbb
Copyright © 2005-2026 Haiguinet.com. All rights reserved.